Dear Users! Please post bug reports about FDM here!

FDM 5.1

Moderators: Usher, Alex

Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Alex » Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:36 pm

Usher wrote:Why new FDM 5.1 builds are still provided with old Firefox WebExtension ver. 3.0.11? It may be a source of problems when updating to fdm_ffext2…

Hello,
New versions of FDM installs extensions from Mozilla(Chrome) extensions stores, i.e. from the Internet. The .xpi extension in the distributive is just a legacy component which is simply not removed yet. :)
Alex,
FDM development team
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Usher » Mon Dec 31, 2018 4:35 pm

I think that it would be better to add current extensions to new builds. That way FDM will be ready-to-use without any update needed.

And what about updating language files? Four pull requests stuck in the queue…
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2784
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Alex » Tue Jan 01, 2019 7:50 pm

Usher wrote:I think that it would be better to add current extensions to new builds. That way FDM will be ready-to-use without any update needed.


This can't be done. Installation from .XPI is not compatible with installation from Store. That's why .XPI will be removed.

Usher wrote:And what about updating language files? Four pull requests stuck in the queue…


Sorry, I can't answer this question. But, FDM6 is our main goal. It should kick both FDM3 and FDM5 (I hope). FDM6 does not support language files currently. We plan to add this as soon as it gets mature.
Alex,

FDM development team
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Usher » Wed Jan 02, 2019 3:51 am

Alex wrote:
Usher wrote:I think that it would be better to add current extensions to new builds. That way FDM will be ready-to-use without any update needed.
This can't be done. Installation from .XPI is not compatible with installation from Store. That's why .XPI will be removed.
Now it's clear…

Alex wrote:
Usher wrote:And what about updating language files? Four pull requests stuck in the queue…
Sorry, I can't answer this question. But, FDM6 is our main goal. It should kick both FDM3 and FDM5 (I hope). FDM6 does not support language files currently. We plan to add this as soon as it gets mature.
I'm talking about pull requests on Github. There are almost complete and of good quality translations for FDM 5.1 there. They should replace horrible automatic translation provided for unkown reasons (to make laugh or to be nominated to The Hall of Shame maybe?) by FDM team and they should be reused in FDM 6 in the future. If you add them now, other users will be able to add missing strings of translation and improve existing ones.

In any case you should NOT start translations in FDM 6 from the scratch again, it would be a plan for suicide. You DID it wrong in FDM 5.x, you should reuse translations from FDM 3.x instead. Automatic translations are so horrible or ridiculous that they should be immediately removed as severe errors.

Without good quality translations you are losing users and you will lose more and more users in the future… It's just a particular case of missing features. Many advanced users have already moved to other software as FDM 5.x doesn't provide features available in FDM 3.x and fixes from FDM 5.x aren't backported to FDM 3.x. Some users did report their dissatisfaction publicly also on this forum.
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
MICPET
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 3:38 pm

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby MICPET » Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:10 pm

Hi

Queue feature please :(
FDM is the best download manager and Queue is the only missing feature !
johnlgalt
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby johnlgalt » Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:44 pm

Hi, devs,

Any idea on when the server time issue that started after version 6.1.34 build 6924 will be fixed?

I hate that I ma missing out on some of the newer features because this is a must-have feature for me....
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Clive Sorensson
FDM Team
Posts: 1396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:06 pm

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Clive Sorensson » Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:55 am

johnlgalt wrote:Hi, devs,

Any idea on when the server time issue that started after version 6.1.34 build 6924 will be fixed?

I hate that I ma missing out on some of the newer features because this is a must-have feature for me....


I've repeatedly informed the devs about the complaints, they are aware of the problem, it's in the works.
johnlgalt
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby johnlgalt » Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:28 pm

Clive Sorensson wrote:
johnlgalt wrote:Hi, devs,

Any idea on when the server time issue that started after version 6.1.34 build 6924 will be fixed?

I hate that I ma missing out on some of the newer features because this is a must-have feature for me....


I've repeatedly informed the devs about the complaints, they are aware of the problem, it's in the works.


Thanks, Clive, for keeping them on their respective toes :p
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
oroville
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:41 pm

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby oroville » Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:06 pm

Where is v5.1.37 [build 7297]?
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Usher » Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:14 am

In the right place (though unlisted for some time).
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Spawn51
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:31 am

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby Spawn51 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:45 am

Just tested FDM v5.1.37.7302 + FF v64.02 + ext v3.0.33, server time/date stamp bug fixed! :wink:
johnlgalt
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby johnlgalt » Sat Jan 26, 2019 1:26 am

Yup - Alex has confirmed and says latest FDM 5.1 supports server time - about to test myself.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
johnlgalt
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby johnlgalt » Sat Jan 26, 2019 1:44 am

Just verified using a test .ISO from OSDN (CloneZilla 261 MB .ISO, link here if you want to test: https://osdn.net/projects/clonezilla/do ... amd64.iso/ )

Indeed, server time is working and now I can have my dark theme, to boot.

Thanks, devs!
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
oroville
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:41 pm

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby oroville » Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:28 pm

Disregard
meitao0211
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 6:04 am

Re: FDM 5.1

Postby meitao0211 » Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:11 am

I can't seeding, when I download it, then restart fdm. The peers show that I have not uploaded the data and can't connect to anyone. Is this a bug?
https://imgchr.com/i/kTisqP

Return to “General forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest